Interactive Lesbian & Gay
Bar and Event Maps

Gay Bar Maps
Lesbian & Gay Bar Maps

Rainbow Cincinnati
Please steal this graphic and
link to Rainbow Cincinnati at: www.gaycincinnati.com

New Site:
Gay Florida dot Info

RSS Feed RSS Feed

Gay/Lesbian Bars Alabama AL Alaska AK Arizona AZ Arkansas AR California CA Colorado CO Connecticut CT Delaware DE Florida FL Georgia GA Hawaii HI Idaho ID Illinois IL Indiana IN Iowa IA Kansas KS Kentucky KY Louisiana LA Maine ME Maryland MD Massachusetts MA Michigan MI Minnesota MN Mississippi MS Missouri MO Montana MT Nebraska NE Nevada NV New Hampshire NH New Jersey NJ New Mexico NM New York NY North Carolina NC North Dakota ND Ohio OH Oklahoma OK Oregon OR Pennsylvania PA Rhode Island RI South Carolina SC South Dakota SD Tennessee TN Texas TX Utah UT Vermont VT Virginia VA Washington WA West Virginia WV Wisconsin WI Wyoming WY District Columbia DC


Rainbow Cincinnati

- www.GayCincinnati.com -
Electronic Community for Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender People

QueerCincinnati's blog

On my interview with David Krikorian

The interview upon which the following blog entry is based is over a month old. In that time, I've been in communication with the Krikorian campaign because of the central ethical dilemma I faced: though I like David Krikorian, the presumptive Democratic nominee for Ohio's 2nd Congressional District, I still harbor some of the same negative feelings that many people who liked and believed in Vic Wulsin in 2008. I kinda felt that his 18% or so of the vote that he garnered in the blue Ohio wave of 2008 was the downfall of Wulsin's political aspirations.

And, though Wulsin was never the best candidate, she is and continues to be one of the most ardent supporters of LGBTQ rights in this corner of the world. Word, however, is that Wulsin will be endorsing Krikorian in the upcoming election, so perhaps that dark tinge on his name may pass.

More importantly, Mr. Krikorian is seeking the Democratic nomination after making a name for himself as the anti-two party system candidate, as a strong independent candidate. He is quick to respond to the criticism as "a little bit of a sell out." And, so, I was met with another ethical difficulty: a man willing to become a hypocrite for expediency and the likelihood of success. I voted for Nader in 2000 -- when I was a South Carolina voter, a state in which Gore had no chance -- on the belief that here was a man who stood by his convictions. More importantly, he is the kind of independent candidate that could win.

When Krikorian announced, then, that he was seeking the 2010 Democratic nomination, I almost felt the bristling of Wulsin supporters, Democratic party voters, and LGBTQ individuals in the city. The man who took down our friend, queer Cincinnati's fiercest supporter in the eastern district, now wanted our votes?

So, of course, I had to meet him.

It's hard to imagine a better word, then, to describe David Krikorian as daring. It takes a bit of gumption to admit his own faults, go against even his own reputation and plow on, perhaps better and stronger than before.

Krikorian dares to tell me, on one had, that he is the best hope for an LGBT friendly, electable candidate in the Second District, while, in the next breath, saying that he will not march in a parade and wave a flag. That kind of candidate -- he insists -- could never win the district, and hasn't yet. He speaks passionately that, no, he will never sign a Defense of Marriage Act; and then, when informed that no DOMA needs left to be signed on either the federal or state level, is willing to fess up to his own ignorance of all the issues and asks for more information.

As he gesticulated wildly with a soon-emptied coffee cup throughout our time together, I knew that I liked him and that he may be ballsy enough to win... and mayhap even do right by his queer constituents in the process.

We met on a Monday morning at the Coffee Emporium downtown. I have met politicians before; I have met first-time polticians before. The best I can say of the former is that they know their stuff and how to turn any conversation to a point in their favor; the best I can say of the latter is that they constantly seek the opportunity in the conversation to a point that they know how to talk about. David Krikorian is neither of these.

"I'm not some local poltician trying to climb the ladder," he emphasizes not far into the conversation. By this point, he's on a roll. When I review my two-hour tape of our conversation, there is a grand stretch where you can tell that Krikorian hits his zone. He is off and running by this point -- probably a good 30 minutes in, and probably for a strong 20 or 30 minutes. I am not asking many questions, but he has many points to make. The conversation varies wildly -- wages, term limits, civil liberties, the problems with the two party system, and the Republicans, specifically. "I'll take the Democratic party over the current incarnation of the Republican Party... [lost in] the wilderness."

Krikorian is clearly a smart guy, and I have no plans to fault him on that. I get it; I get him; for 90% of the time, I'm with him. I even take the extra few seconds in my fierce note-taking (12 pages worth!) to emphasize some of the most poignant and amazing one-liners that I have heard out of a candidate -- "the government has to move to being more victorious in its awesome responsibilities" (YES!), or "there is an absence of statesmen in our political system" (ABSOLUTELY!),

But this blog is about other issues, and I came to talk about LGBTQ issues, a topic he, admittedly, needs more information about.

"I hesitate to pontificate about shit I don't know about," Krikorian quips when I ask him about "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" -- the policy banning LGBTQ military personnel from serving opening, "I've never been in the military, and I've never been gay."

When our interview opened, he was the one asking the questions. He wanted to know more; he wanted to learn more. Krikorian also provided me with a moment where I was, genuinely, surprised. I asked him what he had done for the LGBTQ community lately ... and he whips out a deck of cards, produced by his company at his prodding, that features marriage equality advocates and enemies shown in fierce caricature. On the tape, I hesitate, and there is a moment of silence. Then, you hear me say: "You have actually surprised me, Mr. Krikorian."

And he did, in a lot of ways. I had expected not to like David Krikorian; in fact, I had a whole game plan set up, truly expecting to dislike this man we so easily dismiss as a hypocrite. Clearly, that was not the final result.

Someone asked me a few days later: "What do you think?" "Not good, yet, but educatable," was my response. I think that is my take away from my two-hour interview with David Krikorian: educatable. Sure, I think he has a bit to learn -- "I'm not sure if our little slice of Heaven will be the epicenter [of the gay rights movement]," he said early in the interview. Translated: it's not an issue that will win him elections, and, except for the occasional DOMA (which he describes as a "non-issue...created to divide people"), not on the forefront of his district's mind.

Krikorian is not great on gender -- I get the impression he doesn't get it yet -- so-so on military, but pretty decent to good on employment non-discrimination -- "it's just bad business... why would I take out 10 or 12% of my rental base?" -- and on marriage. After a little pressing, he said that, in a stand alone bill with nothing else attached, he would even vote to overturn the 1996 Federal Defense of Marriage Act. On HIV/AIDS, I would even rate him as excellent. It is rare that a politician, especially one who can draw conservative voters, will identify eliminating homophobia as a possible prevention strategy. Again, surprised.

I hesitate, though, to fully say, "This is the man who will be LGBTQ people's friend in Washington," because, honestly, I'm not sure he always will be. First, I never trust, after John Kerry's 2004 campaign, a politician who uses an incarnation of "at least I'm better than the other guy" argument to win votes. We made that mistake. Second, I get that his priorities are different. He is sure to tell you that he is big on civil liberties ... but I wonder if, faced with a spending or military or healthcare bill that he doesn't like, if he wouldn't let his LGBTQ constituents go for another fight, another day.

But I think he would understand that he made that decision, which is more than many in his situation.

"Do you want someone who is sympathetic and understanding, or do you want Jean Schmidt?" The interview is coming to a close, and I'm chasing final quotes when he says this. I hate the argument, and I shudder a little bit thinking that this may, in fact, be the argument that gets him elected. So I ask him further, why should we vote for him, us queers? Honestly, he puts his head down, and, for a good long half minute, there is silence. He's -- gasp -- thinking about his answer. It is a suprise, from a man who, for two hours, was funny and engaged and quick to answer, and quick to retract mistakes. Silence. Then:

"I would be somebody who will listen to the concerns without religious preconceptions with a focus on civil liberties... and I would ask that they take a practical approach. Give me a chance to represent, and I think they'll find I'm a reasonable person... It's not just about this single issue -- it's an important issue, but we have to look at larger context."

And perhaps he's right. Our little "slice of Heaven" will probably never lead the parade itself, and, perhaps, it is too much to ask our politicians to do so. But it's not too much for them to be reasonable, open-minded, educatable, and daring individuals willing to step up to the plate...

... or maybe it's not enough, to just hope that they will when it comes to.

In the interim, it looks like Krikorian is ahead of Schmidt in the polls. He was quick to point out that "the majority of Ohio's Second voted against Schmidt in 2008" -- clearly indicated a dissatification with the current representation. More importantly, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has targeted OH-2 as a race to win 2010.

Barry is the main contributor to QueerCincinnati.com and tweets more regularly.

Share:

GUEST BLOG: Delivering Important Messages

I have always had a liberal policy of allowing guests to blog on QueerCincinnati.com, and I usually offer up space here on my blog at GayCincinnati.com as a way of giving their post some more permanence. Jason Boeckman has guest blogged here before and has recently started his own bloggie project, Out With it Already! Naturally, I invited him back if he ever wanted the space.

Celebrate the New Hampshire victory for marriage equality because it’s a victory worth celebrating!

No doubt in these next few days we will see plenty media coverage and commentary detailing the marriage happenings in NH and elsewhere as the effort to pass legislation granting civil marriage for same-sex couples continues across the nation.

Progress is made by changing hearts and changing minds. Now is a prime opportunity to discuss gay rights issues with your friends, family members and co-workers. These conversations are necessary for the success of the LGBT movement.

Prepare for these conversations. And here is one very important message to deliver: Regarding New Hampshire’s legalization of marriage f or same-sex couples, emphasize that this right is civil. Much of the coverage leading up to yesterday’s ruling has focused on Governor John Lynch’s demand that explicit language be included in this legislation to protect the freedoms of churches and religious groups opposed to same-sex marriage. Explain that this legislation has always been a matter in the civil sphere and in no way intended to require religions to recognize same-sex marriage. It would be easy for someone only somewhat informed about same-sex marriage to gather from the governor’s protest that same-sex marriage advocates are seeking to force the issue into the religious sphere. It is your task to stop this misconception dead in its tracks. If misconceptions such as this continue to spread, it will certainly delay the exciting progress we’ve seen in these past months.

Congratulations also go out to Impact Cincinnati and all community members who have joined in the response to the incident of violence aimed at one of our own last week at Tabby’s restaurant and bar.

I have read Cincinnati’s local coverage of the incident and response and it’s wonderful to see LGBT issues recognized by mainstream media in our city. I have watched closely the online user responses to some of these articles and it’s clear that there are some in Cincinnati who just-don’t-get-it.

When explaining the reason for the Flash Action event, be sure to emphasize that our presence at Tabby’s was meant to hammer home the message that violence against any person for any reason—including prejudice—is unacceptable and will not be tolerated in our community. When speaking with those who criticize events like these and say LGBT people are just looking for trouble, explain that some confrontation of the issue is necessary because prejudice and violence must be addressed head-on. If not, how will we ever make progress in resolving these problems and cultivating a more peaceful environment?

If we don’t advocate for ourselves, who will?

Barry is the editor of Cincinnati's most prolific LGBT-focus blog, QueerCincinnati.com, and Tweets even more regularly. Check out our guest blogger's project, Out With it Already!

Share:

Failed Ethics Test

I'm in an ethics class at the moment, and one the first questions we had to write on was about the distinction between an ethical decision and other types of decisions we make throughout our day. My answer? There is no difference. Upon closer inspection, our every day decisions are informed by our values, informed by our own morality and our own brand of ethics. Ultimately, what I choose to do says more about me as an ethical creature than what I tell you.

Which is why the events that transpired on the Metro yesterday are so disturbing.

On the bus, I put my headphones in, pull out a book (or my cell phone), and try to present as much of a "back off, I'm not interested in you" aura as possible. I don't really want to talk to most of the people on the bus; I'm just there to move from place to place. It's protective. The numbers of homeless, crazy, and dangerous individuals that populate my bus routes make it a safe and necessary practice.

Yesterday, I was on the bus going to work, and I was texting somebody. We were stopped at the Taco Bell on McMillan and Highland. We hadn't moved for a minute -- not unusual, if the bus is ahead of schedule, the drivers are instructed to wait before moving on so the schedule doesn't become completely discombobulated. But the bus driver was yelling. My interest piqued, I pulled out a single ear bud, wondering if I was the target of her rant (it's happened before). "This is your stop! Get off the bus!" she was yelling. I looked up and down the bus, and everyone was looking forward, but not at me.

I thought it was strange -- am I being pushed off the bus for some unknown slight against my fellow passengers?

A moment later, a man just to my right stood up. He was wearing a red shirt and jean shorts, had a few tattoos, and I had a distinct impression that, surely, this ruffian was the object of their distaste. I relaxed and popped my earbud back in and went back to texting. The whole bus was yelling -- "Man, get off the bus!" "I gotta get to work!" Thankful I was with them on this and glad to see the perpetrated leaving, I relaxed and ignored the situation.

To my left, there was a bookbag and a sleeping bag rolled up. A homeless man sat across the aisleway.

The tall ruffian with the red shirt reached down, grabbed the sleeping bag and the bookbag and threw it out the door. A second man joined him, coming all the way from the back of the bus. Here they were -- two large men (both over six feet), yelling and intimidating this homeless man, screaming for him to get off the bus, joined in a perverse chorus with the bus driver. It was a bizarre moment.

I was making an ethical decision, as I sat there. I chose to do nothing. A hundred excuses popped into my head: the guys are bigger than me and I don't want to receive their anger, what can I really do or say that would make this situation better, do I really know what's going on or am I just guessing. Did I miss something in my distraction? Had he just urinated on himself? Had he cussed out the bus driver? What was going on that was so awful?

I tweeted the situation, instead.

The two guys moved back to their seats as the homeless guy stood up; he looked angry and a little confused -- was he drunk? Then he went to the bus driver, perhaps pleading, perhaps cussing her out, and then the chorus started back up from the back of the bus -- "MAN GET OFF THE BUS!" He turned around, took one step down towards the street, and yelled something back. He took another step, flicked off the crowd, and then took the final step down to the sidewalk, where he began to gather his belongings.

The bus driver immediately shut the door, grabbed a can of Lysol, and sprayed down the seats where both he and his belongings had been. She looked at me, met my eyes, and smiled in camaraderie, "Sorry about that, sir." I'm not sure if she meant the Lysol she was soaking the seats with, or the supposed distraction the homeless man had just caused.

I should have said something to her then, but I responded to a text that came from the original tweet telling me exactly what I should have done -- "You should stick up for him."

He flicked us off as the bus pulled away, a silent retort to the ongoing harassment from the gathered masses. The next couple that came onto the bus, ladened with groceries, were directed to not sit in those seats he just vacated. Silently, I started rationalizing that perhaps he had just made a mess of his seat, and thus deserved the treatment he received.

I let my eyes train around the bus, seeing if anyone else understood. An older lady was against the window and down the aisle, and we looked at each other for a moment. She knew, too; we both knew what had just happened, and we had both done nothing. She looked down at her hands, then back out the window, dissolving back into her own "leave me the fuck alone" attitude we build up around ourselves, for our own protection. The guys were eagerly trying to watch the homeless man fall behind us as we crested the hill and he fell from view; they were laughing and applauding themselves.

"Blog it," was the next text.

Barry is the editor of the popular LGBT blog QueerCincinnati.com, and is active in the Cincinnati Twitterati as QueerCincinnati.

Share:

Smitherman is right

This was written for something else, but it won't be, so I thought I'd come back to my quiet blog over here and post! Much love!

Christopher Smitherman is right.

The appointment of lawyer and anti-gay activist Chris Finney as the Chair of Legal Redress of the Cincinnati chapter of the NAACP is merely a symptom of a larger problem, and one that Smitherman laid out during his radio show on the 29th of March.

Two weeks ago, I had no idea who Finney was -- I assumed he was a tired pariah of a bygone dark age in our city.

Today, I along with many LGBT individuals are justifiably confused and frustrated by the appointment and the subsequent war of words. Finney, one of the architects of Cincinnati's now defunct, hateful Article XII, is no friend to LGBT equality. Smitherman, meanwhile, is a man who has been one of our loudest and most outspoken supporters. As the Enquirer aptly points out, they make strange bedfellows.

Unfortunately, it seemed to be a signal that, despite a history of personal support and recent statements by the national NAACP strongly supporting same-sex relationship recognition, the local chapter was changing its position on the LGBT community. And the not-so-veiled threats and ultimatums and exclusionary rhetoric presented to us by Smitherman was not alleviating our concerns.

Smitherman was right, though, saying that part of the problem is not him, and it is not Chris Finney, it is the ongoing underrepresentation of and seeming lack of concern about people of color within the LGBT community.

For that, I want to thank Christopher Smitherman, and tell him that, trust me, we know.

We are acutely aware of the problem, of the perception of the LGBT movement as one dominated by affluent, college-educated white males. It is a serious and crippling issue and one that we have failed to fully address. For my part, I do not think we've taken the time or energy that is required to. We have been so eager to change the hearts and minds of the African American community and other communities of color that we have
never truly made the attempt to change our own.

The same can be said of class issues -- where are those voices? In a movement that is moving forward with the assistance of social media,
what part can un- and underemployed people play?

The same can be said of geography. Where are the community centers and the opportunities for social interaction in Butler County? Or Clermont, Adams, Warren, and beyond? And what of the South -- have we truly left our brothers and sisters to simply fight for their life and their jobs while we lament on the inequalities of marriage?

The same can be said even of sexual and gender minorities. Trans-identified individuals are underrepresented, and do not get me started on the phenomenon of "straight acting" gay men. Ask lesbians about representation, or bisexuals. I have never been so amazed than by the anger of those two groups at their own exclusion, real or perceived.

Yes, Mr. Smitherman, we have our problems, and a lot of the onus is on us for not trying harder, for believing our own self-created mythos of the affluent, white, urban gay man with one or two OGTs (obviously gay traits) that only accesses the community on Friday and/or Saturday nights.

The fact that Smitherman understands it -- that a straight, African-American male was willing to say what so many of us within the community would be afraid to admit in public -- is admirable. And I applaud him wholeheartedly for his statements and his suggestion that we need to work on it. I applaud him, challenging us to be better and do better by ourselves and by each other.

However, his mention of the failure of Proposition 8 shows a vital flaw in his logic: there are other houses that need cleaning, as well. Homophobia and heterosexism still run rampant within the African-American community and other communities of color -- and it cannot be explained away by demonizing the almost mythical "down low brother" or blaming lesbians on the downfall of the black family in America. Though the LGBT failed to do the proper outreach in California, the fact that the outreach had to happen at all is telling.

Not everyone ascribes to the belief that injustice anywhere equals injustice everywhere.

All the while ignoring, on both sides, that when we talk about the intersection of race, class, sexuality, gender, religion, etc. that these are intersections and do not exist in a political vacuum marked "to be dealt with later." LGBT black individuals and black LGBT individuals (or any combination of the above designations) are, ultimately, the ones who lose in the controversy.

Taking up the charge of intersectional discrimination, especially in the post-Proposition 8 LGBT movement, is both appropriate and invaluable, and I am grateful that Smitherman demonstrates a willingness to open the discussion honestly and, perhaps, work towards a better relationship.

But, before we go there, Smitherman needs to understand why Finney upsets and confuses folks so much, and we need to know that, in expecting communities of color to understand us better, we need to start understanding them better as well.

And, so, Smitherman was right, as much as I may hate to admit it.

Barry blogs regularly at QueerCincinnati.com and Tweets even more regularly.

Share:

Lancing the boil

It is no secret that there is no love lost between me and the Gay and Lesbian Community Center of Greater Cincinnati, but someone whose opinion I genuinely respect called me out this morning on being perhaps a bit mean-spirited towards them in the past.

To the charge of being mean-spirited: duh. It's what I do best.

To respond, however: they need it. I have said that journalism in town is cheerleading, and I knew, going into this project of blogging, that my writing and my person would be sprayed for my opinions, as more divisive than helpful. And despite the rolled eyes as to my qualifications as media, well, I'm a blogger, not a journalist. I've taken it upon myself to be the critic; if people choose not to listen, then that's fine. Seriously. But I have never once stated that I was going to fill the roll of any of the journalists in town -- these are my opinions, unedited (usually).

That said, perhaps there has been some unexplained mean-spiritedness in my past posts, so we came to a deal: I was allowed to write one more post attacking the Community Center and then I would stop the nasty, indirect commentary.

And this is my post:

In many ways, my feelings towards the Center are similar to my feelings towards the community as a whole: vast disappointment. As a kid growing up in South Carolina, I read about cities with places like this and drooled. To have places that were exclusively gay, that were safe, that I could meet people like me, was a dream. And to have a community network of people and organizations dedicated to people like me was unbelievable, and it was something I so desperately wanted to be a part of.

We didn't have GSA's in the south... we still don't, really. Hell, we barely have openly gay anything in the south.

It was natural, when I came to Cincinnati, that I would connect myself to the Center. I'm not going to detail my history there -- I fucked up quite a bit, and the then-President Harold fucked up as well. But that's not the basis of my distaste -- believe it or not.

It's there, and we do nothing with it.

We have taken things like the Center for granted so much so that we don't even care that it exists anymore. Who goes? Nobody. There is a fairly steady crowd of folks who run through the measly building, all the same people, much like any place else. But it's not used, really. Groups don't go there ("it's too small"), individuals don't go there ("no one's ever there"), and it's never open ("there are no volunteers"). We have this place -- a physical center for our community -- and we don't even care that it's there, and the group that has run it seems to even have forgotten why they bother.

Cincinnati, apparently, is so hip, so post-gay that the need for central identity is unnecessary. We'd rather spend our times elsewhere, doing other things, with other people. We'd rather give time to other charities; we'd rather socialize at bars; we'd rather volunteer for other causes. The Center, meanwhile, gets left behind. And the people who run it can do nothing but whine that no one stops by anymore.

Everybody has to prove their muster to the world, occasionally. Speaking personally, I went from Oxford star to nothing, from AVOC star to nothing, from blogger to JoinTheImpact star back to just blogger (meaning "to nothing"). Every few years, we have to prove our worth. The Center has had that opportunity over and over and over again -- Pride, the moment when they could have bought a new building, the rebuilding of the Coalition, the retakeover of CYG, etc. etc. etc. Whereas, yes, the community has forgotten about the Community Center, the Community Center has not truly served the community for years.

Like most things gay in this town, it's dead and dying and has very little fight left in it. It does nothing, is left empty, and will quietly pass into the night. And, conversely, the community will forget about it as if it was never there.

My distaste for the Community Center has nothing to do with my history with it. I am angry at a community that has left a wonderful organization behind and seems willing to let it die, and with a pantheon of individuals who are doing nothing in its final death throes but repeat the same tired lines of inactivity and inopportunity.

And I know it's hard -- I was there, too. I volunteered for two and a half years; I was on the board for 9 months. I know it's hard, but it was hard work to create, and it's hard work to maintain.

I blog because this is all the time I have to give, anymore, outside of the occasional project that I involve myself with. I cannot give completely right now, with school, two jobs, and a slew of personal things I am working through. What the Community Center needs, and the foundation for my criticism for the current administration, is that it needs people who have the time to give and the time to affect change and the time to recreate it.

Not people who are already burnt out from the trying. Experience is a wonderful thing, but the Community Center needs change, drastic change, or I'm afraid we'll all lose it. More importantly, the Community Center needs people who are dedicated and caring to what it could be, not what it is now. And while it's easy for us to blame past or current Presidents for its rancid state of affairs, it is all of our faults for not trying harder and doing better by ourselves and for ourselves.

My criticism of the Center is the same criticism I have for everything: Where are the queers? Gone, and going. Columbus and Chicago are nice, folks, but we're here now. I know we're all busy. I know we're all worried about economic crises and our jobs and our own personal concerns. But take some time. Remember, you didn't come out alone. It's getting easier, but it's still not easy. We all need this, and I think we'll be lesser of a city without the Center.

A classic debate for a board meeting seems to center on one question: are we a place -- for people to meet and gather and talk and organize and volunteer -- or are we an organization -- running the Coalition and Pride?

I think the question is still open for debate.

And, with that, I lance the boil.

Barry blogs regularly at QueerCincinnati.com and Twitters even more regularly.

Share:

On being just another druggie...

He looks like me and has many of the same vices as I do -- smoking, a tendency to use inappropriate substances, and a bitchiness that knows no bounds. He's ten years older, but looks worser for the wear. He tries to maintain his cute gay boyishness by concealing the gray with blonde highlights and cover the lines and bagged eyes with foundation.

He came into the hospital, angry as piss and high. Very, very high.

I've dealt with him for years, seen him go up and down, seen him lose his housing, and seen him get it back. I've seen him single and in relationships; I've seen him sober and drugged up.

Tonight, he just cried on my shoulder.

I heard that he was there from a coworker -- "another pos guy that I think I was annoying." I walked over to the pod and glanced in. He smiled, and then broke down. I would learn later from coworkers that he broke down for anyone who treated him kindly. It was the assumption of badness in people that was driving him to be thankful for the little kindnesses, and for the time you spent with him.

So, tonight, he just cried and I let him.

Sister - dead. Housing - lost. Boyfriend - near dead. Mental status - high. Friend - beat him. Overall - lost.

I told him that I didn't think any less of him, and I didn't. Sure, I was disappointed that he had gotten there, again, but I didn't think less of him. I was glad he was there. I was glad he could cry for me, with me, and I think he was glad that I wasn't scared of touching him despite the rash that could have very well been contagious.

I laid back his bed, got him another pillow, laid his blanket across him, and then turned on the television for him. I told him I'd be back to check on him, soon.

By the time I would come back, he had already been moved to the psychiatric ward.

As I left the room, turning off one of the lights so he could rest, the nurse walked by and said, "So you talked to my druggie, huh?"

I always try to say something back when they treat people like that, but I didn't. I just walked away and filled out some paperwork that he had been there, and I had said hello.

"Just another druggie."

I really don't think that's enough to say about him...

...I hope that's not all that was, or is, said about me.

Disappointed, yes. But I don't think less of him.

Barry blogs regularly at QueerCincinnati.com and is active on Twitter.

Share:

An Open Letter to my Trick from Friday Night

Dear Tony: (um, Mark... no, definitely Tony)

Because you were angry when I threw you out on Friday night/Saturday morning, I thought it was prudent that I detail the reasons that I knowingly kicked you to the curb mid-coitus, into the 3-degree weather, fully knowing that you didn't have ride home.

I would, however, like to say that I'm sorry I didn't even bother to call you a ride and I knew you didn't have a cell phone, but, really, is telling me that you never forget a face really an appropriate response?

Believe me, we all end up on snowy street corners wondering, "Where the hell am I and how do I get home?" In all seriousness, thanks for not throwing a rock through my front window.

You need to work on your hygiene. First and foremost, for the love of god. See, you were kind of cute in the bar, and you had really nice eyes. More importantly, you had that rough look about you that I like in my men... rough and dirty. Yummy. Sure, there were some questions as to your hygiene skills when we talked, but they weren't serious enough for me to be concerned about and it only added to your mystique.

Then you took off your hat. You were a little balding, which is not a problem at all, but it was handled poorly and executed even worse. And when we climbed into the cab, I got a glimpse of your teeth. By this point, the drunkenness was starting to wear off, and I have a thing about teeth. This would explain the immediate rush to get another beer when we got to my front door, and the prolonged sigh when I finally turned on the glaring lights of my apartment.

And why the above mentioned beer was gulped down in about a minute, followed quickly by another.

Finally, when you do expect to go home with someone, please, for the love of god, wipe your ass. Fir that final infraction that so engaged my gag reflex, you will forever be referred to as "mud butt" by me and my friends. Seriously.

The other reason you got kicked out was for your sense of entitlement. At some point, I think you got the idea that we were dating. We weren't, and you lacked the intellectual wherewithal to understand that this would be little more than a trick. I had decided that about five minutes after talking to you, and it was reinforced more and more as the night went on. As the night went on for you, you thought that you were getting more involved with me. Please. The fact that you couldn't figure out that I was throwing you line after line for the sole purpose of getting you into bed indicates a much broader disfunction.

I have to admit, these days, that I have lines, and that I use them and talk of relationship and love to get guys in bed. Once I realized that, the game becomes funnier because some guys just become so easy when you say, "I just want to be loved."

I do, but, if I'm throwing that line your direction, it's probably not by you. You couldn't figure that out, which further disqualified you for any future love interest.

I also had my eyes on someone else, by the way. Someone who was more attractive, more accomplished, more interesting, and actually held some interest to me. How do I know? Because he made me nervous because I wasn't quite sure how to deal with him. You, on the other hand, had your ex-boyfriend's name misspelled in tattoo form on your hand. As the booze wore off, I felt guilty for ending the night with you.

And so, even though I had very much broken my celibacy pledge by the time I finally said, "This isn't working," I felt it necessary to break it off.

And kick you out.

In the snow.

And the cold.

Without a ride home.

I know, it sucks. I've been there before, too, but I was in Norwood at the time. Arguably more dangerous territory than Clifton.

But I would recommend that you not go around talking about this occasion, or I will get to explain to every man in the bar the meaning of the term "mud butt," and then I'll graciously inform them of your other... ahem... shortcomings.

Which, despite everything else, was actually not on my list for why you had to leave.

I'm sure you understand. Hope you made it home OK.

Actually, I really don't care.

Barry

Barry blogs regularly at QueerCincinnati.com and Tweets even more regularly.

Share:

SnOMG: Snow Day

This was written in ten minutes. Seriously.
It started bad enough, the two days of the white death we just had here in Cincinnati.

Two tests with grades in the 70s range -- to my credit, I was six points above the course average in one of the classes -- and a patient assignment that can best be described as "complicated," I managed to get home around 5:00pm to discover I had left my keys at school.

Fuck it, I thought, I'm going to bed.

And so I curled up in bed around 5:15pm on Monday morning, with an alarm set for 1:30am to do my patient assignment work due at 7:00am the following morning.

Only to wake up to snow.

Regardless, I continued on, under the assumption that nurses don't get snow days and we would get the same curtesy. That's why, four hours later and 95% of my homework done, the phone calls surprised me. "We have the day off!" MS said to me. Imagine this: it's 5:30am, I've been up for four hours feverishly finishing work that should have been done the day before, being told that school was cancelled.

I didn't (want) to believe her.

I called my clinical instructor who received the cancellation phone call while I was on the phone with her. "Have a good day!" she said cheerily.

It was now 6:00am, I was knee deep in paperwork and school books, and without keys. I couldn't leave the house.

I finished what I was doing, made a few texts and posted a few blog entries, and tried to go back to sleep. For some reason, my dreams were disturbing -- images of my sister forcefully shoving pills down my throat with my other sister handing them at seeming random to her. I distinctly remember not being able to move the lower half of my body in said dream. Weird.

I think my nap was 45 minutes.

A quick assessment, I realized, again, I couldn't leave the house and there would be no chance to get to now-closed school to pick up my keys. That's ok, I figured, I would be going to work tonight and I will go to school tomorrow and life will return to its normal course.

I turned on a movie and started to ... gasp ... clean. This is about the equivalent as banging my head against the wall. I. Don't. Clean. It's boring and obnoxious.

But I'm proud of my work. My kitchen and my dishes are spotless, much thanks to the abrasive soap-filled scrubby thing I bought at Kroger's on Friday; I even managed to get a mop and broom behind my sink and toilet in my bathroom. All in all, my white tile floors were gleaming and the four bags of trash that somehow managed to collect at my front door made it to the trash. I got so bored with the process that I even managed to soak and bleach my white laundry... and then do my laundry.

All of this is foreign territory to me, and, having felt the day passed relatively well after obnoxious twittering, I laid down for another nap to steel myself against the night shift that evening.

Four hours later, I'm up with a cup of coffee in my hand. A few tweets and a few emails later, I was out the door at 845pm to hit the bus stop at the top of my hill and make it to work.

And stand there until 930.

Bus was supposed to be there at 915. No such luck. Luckily, with my smart phone, I was able to check the Metro website and discover that, if your busstop is on a grade, you should be at the top of the hill. Considering McMillan is nothing but a hill past Clifton, I figured the 51 had just cut off that half of its route. I made the trudging walk in the freezing rain up to the busstop across from Hughes High School.

At about 945, I made a phone call to my boss, whose reaction was less than excited about my plight. He asked me what I planned to do. "Well, I guess I could walk to work." (It's freezing rain and there's snow everywhere. This is not the response I want.) "I don't want you to have to do that." He insinuated I should just take the day off, despite the fact that I had no time off, and we made half hearted attempts at figuring out a solution...

...if the next bus didn't come at 1020pm like it was supposed to. Gr.

Around 1020, the bus had still not come going the opposite direction and I started home with a single thought in my head: beer. I ran up to the ATM on McMillan and started walking back towards my apartment when, glory of glories, my bus drove... straight... by. It was a block away and going in the direction I needed. Quick assessment: run to make it?

Nope. Call my boss and go on with my life.

I am hoping that the little Indian store down the street is open for beer, but make a stop in at Penn Station, which is hopping and I decide to go on with my life.

The little Indian store is closed.

It is now 10:35pm. I have been out for almost two hours, I have no keys into my building, I have no booze, my full course load of books is on my back, and I've just lost a night of work.

Just precious. Of course, when I get home, get let in by my neighbors who do not have an extra key, darling Kate is tweeting about the fabulous wine party going on at her place. This night is not going well.

I start watching my first ever episode of Legend of the Seeker when I get the phone call: "School is cancelled tomorrow." Fabulous, another day without keys. Now I really need booze, and I log onto gay.com in a furtive attempt to find a guy with four wheel drive to bring me some. At this point, I would sacrifice my celibacy for a drink. Again, I can't leave the house.

I think I made it to bed around midnight-thirty after discovering that the second episode of my new favorite show (for Craig Horner's abs) isn't available on Hulu.com.

And then wake up at 11:00am? Did I need the sleep?

The rest of the day is spent in a desperate attempt at writing something, trying to do some homework, and realizing that my home environment, despite being carefully planned and laid out, is not conducive to work. That frustrates me, and I call my classmates in a desperate attempt to relieve the boredom of watching local news, random movies, and posting on Twitter/Blog.

Sleep comes and now I'm at work.

I haven't really left the house in two days, I'm suffering desperately from cabin fever, and, now, I thought it would be a great time to post on GayCincinnati.com.

It's not like I didn't have two days with nothing to do the same.

Apparently, home is just no where I'm supposed to be.

Barry blogs regularly at QueerCincinnati.com and also twitters with quite some regularity. You should never be without Barry, if you need him.

Share:
1
next page
last page
XML feed


| Home | News | Calendar | Community | Business | People | Fun Stuff |


**NEW Twitter



Dedicated to Chuck France and his Spike and his Winston
Charles France
(1961-1996)
Spike
(1989-2002)
Winston
(1989-2003)

Website Design: Steve Buescher, BeeGraphics
Website Copyright © 1997-2012, Rainbow Cincinnati

The Rainbow Cincinnati web site at www.GayCincinnati.com is for informational purposes only. The information is subject to change without notice. Any use of, or actions taken based upon any of the information contained on this web site is done entirely at your own risk. Mention of any products or services is for informational purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation. Rainbow Cincinnati and those associated with Rainbow Cincinnati assume no responsibility with regard to the selection, performance or use of these products or services.

Privacy Policy